Harvard Student Magazine Paused After Controversial Language
Key Vocabulary
board of directors /bɔːrd əv dɪˈrɛktərz/
reprehensible /ˌrɛprɪˈhɛnsəbl/
formulation /ˌfɔːrmjʊˈleɪʃən/
disciplinary /ˈdɪsəplɪnəri/
investigate /ɪnˈvɛstɪɡeɪt/
📖 Article
The Harvard Salient's board of directors paused the magazine's operations on Oct 26, 2025, after saying that recent content was 'reprehensible, abusive, and demeaning.' The ten-member board, which includes alumni and four ex officio advisers, listed names such as Alex Acosta and Naomi Schaefer Riley among its directors and said it would investigate deeply the complaints it had received.
In a September issue, an essay contained the line 'Germany belongs to the Germans, France to the French, Britain to the British, America to the Americans,' a formulation that echoed a 1939 speech by Adolf Hitler and that prompted immediate condemnation from many students. The piece, written by David F.X. Army, also used the phrase 'blood and soil' while arguing that migration has reshaped nations; the editors have defended the article and said they did not intend to quote Hitler.
Harvard College officials have in large part stayed out of the dispute: Dean David J. Deming said he would review the matter only if a formal complaint were filed, and therefore university disciplinary channels have not been triggered. Nevertheless, campus debate has intensified, with opinion columns and student meetings that have weighed free speech against community standards; if the board finds systemic problems, it could take further actions that affect the magazine's future.
Observers have noted that student-run publications can influence campus culture, and while defenders of robust debate argue that shutting a paper could chill speech, others say that publications must meet ethical standards. Consequently, the Salient's pause has become a test of internal governance: the board's findings, which may recommend training, leadership changes, or a longer suspension, will determine whether the magazine can resume regular publication.
❓ Quiz
💬 Discussion
Do you believe schools should discipline student media for harmful language? Why or why not?
Have you seen a printed or online text that caused strong reactions where you study? What did people do?
What do you think students can do to keep debate strong but respectful?
Would you join a meeting to discuss campus speech issues? What would you say?
How should a student group balance historical context and modern responsibility when writing?