MediumEducationOctober 12, 2025

John Searle: Mind, Machines, and a Contested Legacy

Key Vocabulary

thought experiment

an idea or scenario used to test a theory
Example: Searle used a thought experiment to question AI.

consciousness

the state of being aware of thoughts and feelings
Example: He wrote about consciousness and the brain.

emeritus

an honorary title for a retired professor
Example: The university revoked his emeritus title in 2019.

intentionality

the 'aboutness' of thoughts—the fact that thoughts can be about things
Example: Searle wrote about intentionality in language and mind.

📖 Article

John Searle (July 31, 1932 – September 17, 2025) was a leading American philosopher who taught at the University of California, Berkeley since 1959. He has shaped debates about language, consciousness and artificial intelligence. His 1980 paper 'Minds, Brains, and Programs' introduced the Chinese Room thought experiment, which argues that symbol manipulation alone does not produce understanding. Searle also defended 'biological naturalism,' the view that conscious states are biological phenomena. He was awarded the National Humanities Medal in 2004 for work on the mind.

Although his work was influential, his career was marred by misconduct findings. In June 2019 Berkeley revoked his emeritus title after a university determination that he violated sexual harassment policies. While some readers continue to study his arguments, others have criticized his behavior and its impact on students and colleagues. Searle died on September 17, 2025 at age 93. He also wrote books such as Speech Acts (1969) and The Construction of Social Reality (1995), which influenced social philosophy. Therefore many students and scholars still discuss his arguments in classrooms and conferences.

176 words

❓ Quiz

Q1. When did John Searle die?
Q2. What medal was he awarded in 2004?
Q3. When did Berkeley revoke his emeritus title?

💬 Discussion

1.

Do you believe that debates about AI affect everyday life? How?

2.

Have you ever read or heard an argument that changed your view about technology? What was it?

3.

What do you think about separating a scholar's ideas from their personal actions?

4.

Would you take a university course that included controversial thinkers? Why or why not?